Every baker has a special fondness for his first bread book, and this was mine. It's not the most comprehensive, it's got some recipes that offend purists and the recipes use volume measure. Still, if you can take a little time to convert the recipes to weight, most of them work, and work well. Look carefully at his Italian bread, Careme French, Normandy Breaten Bread, Honfleur Country Bread, his several types of briosches and his Pan Mie de Monaco. And the anecdotes transport the reader back to a simpler, slower, time.
If you want to learn about Italian bread and how to make it, this is the book. Okay, so it's 20 years old. It's still the best single book on Italian bread going. She's got ciabatta, the latest fad bread. She's got the rustic and artisan breads. She's got a coccodrillo bread that's so wet you can't knead it. She's got a whole bunch of other good breads that you might not even know about. The recipes have both volume and weight measurement.
This is a book from the 1980s and the days when recipes were measured in cups. In spite of this, this is one of my favorite bread books. Just about every recipe I have made from this book has worked very well, even when I've modified the recipe to use preferments. The instructions are clear and accurate. She covers all the basics and then shows how to make them look good, too. The jacket blurb says she's "America's most imaginative chef." I don't know about that, but this is a valuable book. If you can find a copy, it's well worth buying.
Many people have commented that this fine little book plays second fiddle to his magnum opus, The Bread Baker's Apprentice. This is a misconecption. Crust and Crumb was there before BBA, and is, in my opinion, just as deserving of a place on your bookshelf. It's a fine book, more concerned with making bread, maybe, than with having a point of view. The ciabatta and rustic recipes are straightforward and accurate, as are the white bread and traditional French. It's worth a careful look, if only to see what Peter Reinhart was up to before BBA.
I almost feel I don't need to comment on this book. It's one of the two or three best books on bread and bread baking ever. Period. The first 100 pages are simply one of the two best expositions on baking bread I have seen. Get this book. Study it. There will be a quiz this Friday.
This is serious competition for BBA. Again, I don't feel a real need to comment on this book. The depth of knowledge and the thoughtfulness of the presentation speak of his experience and training. The recipes mostly work. I had trouble with his section on sourdough, but then again, sourdough is a tough thing to master, so I'll give him a pass here. His technique and technical sections are comparable to BBA; this is the other best book. Again, buy this book.
Many people have criticised this book for not being clear, or for having strangely-written recipes, or for being inconsistent between the amateur and professional sections. These are partially valid complaints, but what they miss is that this is a first-rate bread book, written by a man who was there at the start of the bread revolution, in the trenches and on the barricades. My copy of this book is in tatters. It's got so many notes and additions to the recipes that I can't read the original printing in some places. The pages are falling out. In short, I've used this book a lot and really like it.
Over the years, I've found that recipe books published by the food supply companies are usually very good. This little seven-page pamphlet is no exception. It's a very straight-forward, simple set of instructions that tell you how to make French bread and Ciabatta. Nothing more. But, and this is the interesting thing, once you've made these two breads and mastered the technique, you'll have mastered the basic technique of making most artisan breads. I highly recommend this little pamphlet. Get it from General Mills directly. I created a minor tempest several years ago when I got this pamphlet, read it, and mentioned it on the alt.bread.recipes bread newsgroup. Seems GM was hit with a bunch of requests for the pamphlet, and they wondered "What happened?" They finally got things sorted out, but it was fun for a while.
(Also her Bread Bible, although I don't own it) When I want an idea for a different bread, something out of my normal pallet, I turn to this book. It's glossy. It's not got a whole lot of recipes. But the ones it does have are accurate and well described. The book has a lot of recipes for enriched or flavored or just different breads. I don't know if this is a must-have book, but I'm glad I have it.
A book by another veteran of the bread revolution, this time 1980 and the establishment of a US branch of a Milanese bakery. The breads are made using slow techniques, although I don't think the Slow Food or Slow Town movements had started then. Galli makes use of preferments in a lot of the recipes, and a lot of the recipes are similar, differing mostly in handling or rise or shaping. In a sense, this is a textbook in how to use time and technique to make different breads from a common recipe. I bought the book for the recipe for Sfilatino and became enchanted with Pagnotta, Ciabatta, Etrusca (How anyone can have a recipe for Etruscan bread when we know zilch about Etruscans is a good question. Sort of like asking about Minoan animal husbandry.), Altamura, Filone, etc. Not a lot of recipes, just the ones you need. Not many pictures, either, which is a shame. But it's still a book I reach for more than by chance.
I found this little book in a book store on the table of books that appeared to have been commissioned by the store. It looks like a bright, light little thing, something that a charity group might put out.
Boy! Are looks deceiving! This is a serious little bread book. Lots of good recipes, weights in English and metric, a bunch of great pictures, etc. For me, as an American baker, it was a revelation to see the great number of English breads they present. Baps, Bloomers, Bannocks, Bara Brith, Sally Lunn -- you get the idea. How about such things as Portuguese Corn Bread? Interesting little book, one of my favorites. My only quibble is that they mention several interesting breads and don't follow up with a recipe. Minor quibble. The prime example of this is sfilatino. They show a picture, but fail to follow up with a recipe. I had to buy the Il Fornaio book to get the recipe, which put another good bread book on my shelf. On second thought, maybe that's not all bad.
Forget all the other pizza books. This is the one. Learn to make a pizza that's close to DOC Pizza. Forget the olive oil, the secret ingredients, the mumbo-jumbo. This is the real goods. Get this book and learn to make the DOC pizza and you will be a convert for life. Then, follow up with a visit to Jeff Varasano's pizza site, and you'll be in seventh heaven. Not many recipes, a few good pictures. What it is is an introduction to an older, more traditional method.
This is the standard reference to what it says, food and cooking. Not recipes, but the art and science of what they are. My edition is the original, 1984, but he has published a new edition. The section on bread science is very good. If you are a serious cook, you should have this book.
Yup, The Original. 1928, second printing. This book is in the FAQ for alt.bread.recipes, thanks to two hard-working people, Kathy Rapp, who did the OCR (www.katscan-ocr.com), and Dick Margulis (www.dmargulis.com), who did the proof-reading and corrections, and the kind permission of ACH Foods. For a glimpse into the world of the 1928 baker and his best practices, into a whole slew of good, solid recipes and a lot of sound bread writing, this is the book. You might be surprised at how much of the New stuff is really Old stuff. Give it a try on the bread board or buy a copy on eBay. It's a real must-have for the serious baker.
No, I'm not kidding. I found this oddity on the Seabee Cook (www.seabeecook.com) and fell in love with it. It turns out that the soldiers of 1916 were eating some pretty good bread! It has instructions for doing the whole thing, from packing the wagon for a move to setting up a baking company area to the whole baking cycle for several different breads. I just bought a copy on eBay and it's even better than I thought! It's a whole manual on how to bake bread a la 1916, complete with admonitions such as "All flour, regardless of presumed conditon, should be carefully sifted before using. Small nails, pieces of twine, slivers of wood, etc., in addition to hard lumps, are frequently removed from flour supposed to have been put up in the most careful manner." My kinda guy! Believe it or not, the methods presented here are very much in the latest modern idiom. Definitely worth a look.
One interesting, at least to me, point. Deitrick's breads are made with sponges, at least for the first runs. Wihlfahrt, writing about American commercial practices just 10 years later, claims that sponges are passe, that the best bread is now (1928, remember) made using straight dough methods. Yet even he seems to waffle a bit. I guess this arguement has been going on a long time.
So how do I tell which books I use the most? Simple. Every time I use or read or refer to one of my books, I place it on the right end of the shelf. Over time, the books at the other end are the ones I haven't referred to in a long time.